It must be love, the way we keep on coming back to basic income on this blog. Expecting a deeper discussion of the matter in the near future.
A new report from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: A policy maker’s guide to basic income
(link to 42-page .pdf file)
A second CCPA report:
Basic income: rethinking social policy
(link to 62-page .pdf file)
An item from the Summer 2016 edition of Canadian Dimension which was devoted to the topic of basic income:
More smoke than substance in Canadian plans. Ontario wants pilot project, Quebec advocates tiny steps
Canada: please imitate:
GERMANY: single-issue political party founded to promote UBI
The Chicago Tribune looks at a privately funded “emancipatory income” program in Germany.
If you were handed $1,100 a month, would you amount to anything?
image: fdecomite via Flickr/CC
According to a two-part feature in Der Spiegel Online International, the suburban poverty machine has been grinding away at Berlin for a couple of years now. A real estate boom has been attracting speculators to a city with a remarkably uneven economy. The primary result of this will be familiar to North American readers of this blog: the pushing of the poor and vulnerable to the periphery, jacked up rents and a feeling that the boom is out of control and is changing the city for the worse. Nobody is saying that every part of a major city has to be set aside as a game preserve for the poor but neither should it be looked on simply as an object from which to wring exaggerated profits at the unfair expense of many of its inhabitants.
image: composite via Wikimedia Commons
Berlin should have Straßen mit Gold gepflasterte. It is a major city-state by any standard: 3.5 million people in 900 square kilometers with an economic output of about 100 billion Euros. The city is renowned for its universities, green spaces, public transit, cultural and business life. It is also much poorer than Germany as a whole.
Spiegel Online International published a brutal piece on Thursday about the slum housing industry in Germany’s capital. This is a true industry, the large-scale undertaking of rental brokers and property owners to exploit the social difficulty of newcomers and the poor. Truly hazardous nineteenth century dilapidation and exploitation is visited upon Roma, and other vulnerable people, to the profit of businesses registered outside of Germany. The authors describe a lack of heat, toilets that don’t work and rents that have skyrocketed. Those among Europe’s worst off people don’t complain, or cannot complain, indeed, seem not to even know they have the right to complain. “…conditions on some of the floors at Scharnweberstrasse 111 are like those in a refugee camp, with multiple parties sharing the few intact bathrooms,” say the authors.
Scharnweberstrasse 111 is cited as an example of a business model involving some 6,000 apartments and numerous players. It is a low-rise residential building located barely one kilometer from the end of the runways at Tegel airport. You can see it for yourself via Google Street View. A mysterious German said to be abusing social welfare is described as having been the agent for a firm called Helvetica which has partners in the Middle East, Asia and the UK, exemplifying Berlin’s lucrative, internationally-based real estate industry. Cash rents are funnelled upwards to the partners via Helvetica and a brace of holding companies after a handsome premium is deducted by the broker. Claims are made as to the social value of housing the Roma, the homeless, the mentally ill, displaced youth and ex-convicts. But this is true suburban poverty partly facilitated by a sell-off of publically held apartment buildings by a city government under financial stress. In Berlin, a dynamic real estate and property development market exists alongside socio-economic difficulty with results that are not pretty.
Where this particular mess will be in twenty-five years defies positive imagination.
After the 80s crash, again in 1992 and after the dot-com crash of 2000 or so there was reason to question the sustainability and necessity for returning to high-levels of global economic growth. The persistance of the Great Recession sees reasoned arguments emerging again for managing advanced economies on behalf of something other than whacky, destructive boom-and-bust cycles. If capitalism is to be the dominant economic structure a new approach will be adopted in some form, sooner or later. Why not take it on now by choice, when there are still some resources and some leeway left? Thoughts from Germany…
photo: Adam Crowe via Flickr
European academic journal Articulo published a piece in 2010 analysing the general discourse around suburbia in Germany and the US. The objectivity of the piece may annoy readers with strong feelings about the suburbs, good or bad. The author finds suburbia neither heaven-on-Earth nor hell manifest. He calls for, and provides, more detailed understanding of life beyond the urban centres. Looking at American experience and the sheer scale of suburbia there the comparison to Germany may seem less than useful but we found the piece brainy and articulate. Going forward, it is hard to imagine that suburban outbuilding will continue in Europe even if it makes use of public transit and sustainable sources of energy. In North America the suburban project seems to be over, to be contracting if anything. To have modelled any part of their built environment on North America is probably a worrisome thing to Europeans, doubly so now that the Euro crisis is fully arrived.